Risen is an old-school role playing game that does very little to make itself appealing to the more “casual” gamer. In terms of overall characteristics, Risen is similar to games like Oblivion- but whereas Oblivion tries to make it easy to progress and overcome your mistakes, Risen makes no such allowances. Interestingly enough, although I generally like “easier” games, I’m actually really enjoying Risen… on the PC. From what I’ve seen and heard, the XBox version should be avoided.

Background

Risen is the latest game from Piranha Bytes, the developer behind the Gothic series. And in fact, many would say that Risen is actually “Gothic 4″, and those saying this likely wouldn’t be far off the mark. Piranha Bytes lost the right to use the name “Gothic” to their former publisher. This may not be a bad thing: Gothic 3 (the last game released under this name) was a bit of a buggy mess, and so distancing their latest game from this name for now probably avoids some negativity.

There are a few oddities to keep in mind when looking at reviews of Risen. Firstly, there are significant differences between the PC version and the XBox version (currently only released in Europe). Both games are functionally the same, but the user interface for the XBox version is apparently nightmarish: the complex keyboard-driven UI was apparently “grafted” and squeezed onto the XBox controller with confusing and complicated results. Further, any XBox reviews written thus far are for the original European release: the developer has apparently delayed the North American release in order to try to resolve many of the user interface issues identified.

My review here is strictly of the PC version. It is worth noting that most reviews of the PC version are scoring the game somewhere in the 60-70% range, where reviews of the European XBox version are in many cases scoring in the low to mid 40% range. Again, the underlying game is the same in both versions: the difference is the clumsy user interface conversion to the XBox platform along with some graphics degradation.

The Story

Risen starts you off as the traditional “survivor washed up on the shore”: it is very reminiscent of the beginning of Age of Conan, actually. You quickly discover that strange things are afoot: a religious order has taken control of the island you arrive on, declared a sort of martial law, and sealed all of the citizens in the nearest city. Simply by wandering about you are automatically a criminal: in violation of the orders of martial law.

Ancient and previously unknown ruins are rising up out of the ground throughout the island, starting a sort of gold rush as adventurous souls try to gather up artifacts and golden trinkets from the suddenly revealed caches. Unfortunately, monsters and traps abound in these places, and most of the wealth seekers end up dead. A bandit leader has gathered a small cadre in the woods, providing a possible home and camaraderie for like-minded adventurers.

The religious order seems to be seeking something amongst the artifacts as well, and is capturing/arresting any unauthorized looters, seizing their treasures, and conscripting many people for unknown reasons. Your choice early on is to decide whether to side with the rebellious treasure-seeking adventurer/bandits, or to join the Order’s numbers. This is far from a black and white choice: things are not as they seem. And all around the island roars an unremitting tempest, rumoured to be the wrath of ancient gods. What is holding it at bay? And for how long?

Graphics and sound

The character graphics in the PC version are workmanlike- nothing special, but reasonably good. Some of the environmental graphics can, at times, be gorgeous: not hyper-realistic, but stylized. Overall, the impression is of a well-realized world with a definite style, but nothing which moves the state of the art forward.

On a high end PC (3.6 GHz quad core w/ATI 3870×2) playing at 1920×1200, the images are crisp and screen refresh rate is reasonably consistent: there are occasional frame drops, but they never impacted the game play significantly.

Apparently the graphics on the XBox are significantly poorer, particularly character graphics. The worst aspect I’ve heard reported on the XBox is that the world is quite dark and the XBox version has no ability to adjust gamma (brightness). The PC version does provide this facility, but thus far I haven’t found darkness to be a problem.

Audio in Risen is also simple but effective. The music is very repetitive, at least to my ears, but easily ignored: if you can’t do great music, at least make it unintrusive. Sound effects are similarly functional, with limited use of directional sounds. However, because of the “deadliness” of monsters in the game, I often found myself spinning around in response to the rare sound behind my back, and in that sense the effects are good. “Atmospheric” sounds are bland to the point of being irritating. There are some “miscellaneous scary monster noises” that seem to play throughout the game any time you are outside the city that have no apparent relationship to nearby creatures that, in particularly, I find aggravating.

Game Play

Risen is an old school RPG in several senses. Your character is “fixed” in appearance and gender, but has a complex set of skills and abilities that you can train up. As you level you gain points you can spend on training: training involves spending these points plus some gold to improve your selected skill. Note that you have to find a trainer for the appropriate skill: you can’t just do this in the middle of the woods somewhere.

Skills do not improve through use, but only through training. As per traditional RPGs, you also have “characteristics”: strength, wisdom, etc. These can be improved through potions, herbs, magic items, and some trainers.

You must make certain choices during the game that will constrain your future options: are you a mage, a bandit, or a warrior of the order? Based on your choices, you will have some limitations on how you can develop your abilities in the future.

It is impossible to be a true “jack of all trades”, although it is possible for all the character choices to use some weapons, some magic, and some “thief like” skills. What differs is how far you can develop those abilities. Note that the only path I’ve followed thus far is the Mage, so I am less familiar with the other choices.

• Mages have access to develop all magic skills: runes (casting many/complex spells without materials plus creation of scrolls); crystals (casting a limited number of “pure energy” spells based on the traditional four elements), and spell scrolls (spells cast from a pre-created scroll). Mages can max out their staff fighting skills, but are limited in terms of armour and weapons they can effectively use.

• Warriors of the Order are more like battle mages. They can use crystals and scrolls, and also have full access to heavy armour and blade weapons. They can not use rune magic.

• Bandits have full access to the “thief” abilities like sneaking and pick pocketing. They can use pretty much all weapons and armour. For magic, they can use scrolls, but I’m not sure about crystals and I’m certain they can’t use runes

The game does nothing to make your choices here universal or convenient. For example, if you want to be a mage or Warrior of the Order, you have no choice but to join the Order: the bandits have limited access to the ancient knowledge. If you don’t like it that way, tough: that’s the way the world is.

Similarly, the game does nothing to coddle you in combat or on quests:

• If you get into a fight and want to drink a magic potion, you have to put down your weapon first: you don’t suddenly grow a third arm or possess some sort of magical straw running from the potion bottle to your lips allowing you to drink it while swinging your sword. Naturally, if you put away your sword and drink a potion, the monsters see this as an opportunity to rip you a new one: they don’t stand by and wait politely for you to heal yourself back up. This doesn’t make using a potion in combat impossible, it is just very hard to do without taking more damage
• Spells are not instant cast: using magic in combat means getting back and buying yourself time to cast. If you are in close melee and try to use a spell, you’ll be opening yourself up to be hit
• Groups of monsters will rip you to shreds. This isn’t Diablo or something: even at 10th level and midway through the game, a group of five or six wolves (non-magical creatures) is seriously dangerous. And attacking one member of a group will attract others nearby: separating groups is a challenge
• running away works… but monsters will follow you for a long way. Intelligent monsters will often cut the chase earlier, for example to return to whatever it is they are guarding, but “bestial” creatures seem willing to chase you great distances. Splitting up a group requires at least a little bit of strategy
• Fighting other humans is often very difficult. Most of the humans at least up to the mid-point of the game are simply tougher and more skilled than you. But many of the early quests will force you to fight the “to unconsciousness”: your one advantage over the non player characters is that you can be stupidly persistent. You can choose to leap up after being knocked unconscious, drink a (very expensive at the time) healing potion, and attack them again before they heal back up… a tough road, but one you have to follow. Some of the NPCs will even comment on this: “Haven’t you had enough?”. Note also that each time you are knocked out, the NPC can pick stuff off your body- generally they’ll take a few coins, but if you really tick them off they’ll start taking your weapons…
  • note that you get the same opportunity: when you knock out your human foe, you can pick money and items off their body… thereby recovering what they took from you earlier
• Many of the foes you encounter will be vastly over-match you. It won’t stop you from being stupid and attacking them. There *are* some controls on where you can go initially, but once the world opens up a bit (in Chapter 2) you will regularly be running into things that are far beyond your current capabilities to fight. There are no convenient “this monster is level XXX: don’t attack!” indicators. The first time you attack something you’ve never seen before is sure to be a learning experience…
• You will regularly be given quests that are impossible to complete at your current level. The characters you talk to realistically have no way of knowing you are too weak, and if you ask about something they assume you know what you are doing. Just because you’ve got the quest doesn’t mean the game thinks you should be able to finish it right now
• Some of the traps in dungeons are “instant kill”. Save often! If you see strange marks on the walls and floor that look out of place, *save right now* before you take another step. You *will* die regularly. Its the way this kind of game works. But if you look around carefully after dying to a trap, you will usually find an alternative route, or a switch to disable the trap itself
• You can’t expect alternative solutions to problems just because that would be convenient. For example trap might require that you trigger a distant switch to disable it. If you don’t have a spell or a bow to hit that trigger, too bad: don’t expect anyone to come fix the problem for you. You’ll have to go and buy that spell on a scroll, or purchase that bow, and come back later
• Maps are limited and imperfect. For example, I have a quest now that asks me to go to the east side of the island and find some guy. The east side of my map is blank, and simply walking to the east won’t fill in the map: I’m not a cartographer. If I want an improved map I’ll have to find a cartographer to make it for me… or I’ll have to just wander around in the east and hope
• you can’t “pause” to do something within the game: for example, if you want to switch weapons you will take the time necessary to switch weapons- during which time monsters can still attack you. If you open your inventory or look at the map, the monsters are still attacking you. You *can* pause the game, but while doing so none of the in game choices (like switching weapons, organizing/selecting from inventory) are available
• If you enter an NPC’s house and they see you, they will generally warn you not to steal anything. If you steal something and they see it, they will attack you and will thereafter consider you a thief and hate you. Once they hate you, they will no longer talk to you- potentially cutting you off from completing or activating a quest
  • you can “fix” this by finding and using a particular spell (“Jest”) on them, basically causing them to forget your past indiscretions
  • apparently, if you steal some very special items or kill certain “friendly” characters, some NPCs will never trust you/talk to you again regardless of whether you use Jest on them. I’ve never encountered this

These factors combine to create an experience for me at least that is both enjoyable and frustrating. You really do feel weak and feeble early on, but nothing stops you from taking on a vastly overpowered foe and getting lucky. By mid-way through the game (where I am now), my character and I are starting to feel competent. I can take a few hits, hold my own against two or three foes, and know how to “split” most larger groups. I’m still only able to cast a handful of spells, and I still get in over my head pretty regularly and die with alarming frequency. But the save game/ quick saves make this relatively easy to recover from.

In terms of size, Risen is big: I’m probably at most a third of the way through and have played for a total of about 20 hours.  I don’t know if the following chapters (I’m on chapter 2, there are four in total) are equally large, but the impression I get is they are at least as lengthy.  That would suggest that Risen is good for 60 to 100 hours of game play, assuming your play style matches mine.

Cheating

I’m not one generally to use game cheats to solve all my gaming problems. However, I found Risen to be tough enough that I imagine most people, myself included, will feel that cheating is a viable way to continue on to the more enjoyable stuff. Its your game, you choose how to play it. In that vein, I’ll give a few pointers regarding how to cheat on the PC game.

Risen has a “testing” or development mode that you can invoke. In this mode you can open a console and type various script commands that will allow you to add items to your inventory, increase your abilities, change NPC behaviour, and summon/delete NPCs. Note that using these “cheats” may cause problems in the game: for example, deleting a critical NPC may make it impossible to finish the game, and choosing to fill your inventory with every item in existence may cause a crash. You’ve been warned.

To invoke the testing mode (this only works on the PC version):

• while playing the game (i.e.: with your character active and adventuring, but preferably somewhere “safe”), quickly type “minsky”
  • if you type too slowly, the testing mode won’t be invoked
• A message will appear on the screen similar to: “Testing mode invoked”
• Open the console by pressing the tilde (“~”) key; the console will slide down over the upper part of your screen
• type various commands at the console to give yourself items/skills/etc
  • A fairly complete list exists here

I have used cheat mode once so far: when I got stuck on a critical quest in the monastery. I unknowingly stole something belonging to an NPC that I later discovered was I needed to talk to in order to progress, and didn’t have/couldn’t find a single copy of the Jest scroll. So I cheated and put one in my inventory… while I was cheating, I also bumped my staff skill a couple of points and gave myself the ability to sneak.

Is this kind of cheating really wrong? That is entirely in the eye of the beholder. For me, it got me over a few bad spots in the game play that would have frustrated me. For someone else, the lack of a scroll would have been grist for an entirely new adventure: the quest for the Jest. Note that the “opening every cupboard/taking everything that isn’t nailed down” mode of play is a bad habit I had from previous games. If I had been playing as if I were a real character in the world, I wouldn’t have been going around opening everyone’s lockers and taking their stuff to begin with.

In a more forgiving game, there would have been no need for the scroll as I’m sure the NPC would either conveniently “forget” I had robbed them or there would be no way to make them mad like that in the first place. But how realistic is it to be able to walk past a home owner, steal all of their meagre possessions, then have them willingly and politely talk to you/offer you kindness a few seconds later? Not very, and I can respect Risen for punishing me for doing that.

That said, if I were playing a traditional pen and paper RPG and got totally stuck, most DMs would give me something to get me over the hurdle: in a computer game like Risen, that benevolent DM is totally lacking, and the game cares not a bit if you are frustrated.  Another way to cheat, of course, is to read various quest walkthroughs.  One of the best I’ve found can be found here.  To use my pen and paper analogy again, this would be somewhat equivalent in effect to buying the same module your DM is running, or sneaking a peak at their notes.  But once again, it is a way to overcome progress-stopping obstacles that a real-life game master would likely observe and correct to keep game flow intact.

And at its root, that is the difference with this type of RPG. There are rules in this world, and it isn’t intended to suit itself to your needs. It isn’t a better or worse way to play a role playing game, but it is different and, for me at least, quite enjoyable.  At least with my cheats

Action games are a genre that I really didn’t understand until I played Bayonetta. I could therefore say that the $60 I spent on this game was educational: I have been taught that I should not buy this kind of game. The kindest things I can really say about Bayonetta from my perspective are that the graphics are impressive, and the main character has one of the finest digital rumps in computer history.

If you generally agree with everything I say, you have no need to read further.

You are still here, so you must be inclined to doubt my assessment. And that is fine: I know that plenty of reviewers vehemently disagree with me. Even the most negative review I could find (and from which I paraphrased part of my title) ended up giving the game an 8 out of 10 rating.

In fact that’s why I decided to buy the game- I don’t like to assume I’m always right. Some games can truly redefine a genre and, as I said previously, until playing Bayonetta I really didn’t have a good grasp on what the whole “action game” term meant. Now I do and, since Bayonetta is supposedly the absolute best of its kind, I think my definition and associated dislike can be justified.

So what are action games? Well, if you go by the Wikipedia definition, it is pretty much every type of game where stuff happens quickly. But I’ll give a more specific definition: an action game is a game which takes the concepts found in games like Street Fighter, tacks on a weak plot to tie the fights together, and desperately tries to grind your button mashing fingers into submission. There are some specific factors that immediately identify the action genre for me from this point forward:

1. Button combos for combat: Remember in Street Fighter on consoles how you would hit various sequences of buttons and, if you did it right, you’d perform a special combat move? That’s what I’m talking about here. So in Bayonetta you might hit Y-Y-Y<pause>B to get one attack, and Y-Y-Y-B (without the pause) to get a completely different attack
2. Frenetic action: That’s why they call this an action game, I guess. Stuff is flying at you non-stop, and bigger, noisier, splashier stuff all the time. If you have time to think, the game must have crashed. You can only learn the game by playing it over and over and over and over and over and over again
3. Non-sensical plot: the plot must not only be meaningless, it must be viciously, cruelly silly.
4. Stylized, over-the-top visuals: nothing in an action game needs or cares to be reasonable or realistic. The more extreme it is, the better. If the sword is the size of a diesel locomotive, and the foe the size of an oil rig, it is getting close to extreme enough
5. Punishing save game system: Checkpoint saves aren’t unpleasant enough for action games. The save game must place you at the very beginning of a chapter or level. Pausing may be acceptable, but if you need/want to shut your console off for a while, you should be required to re-play all the crap that drove you crazy the first time. It is in this way that one learns the combos and strategies, after all (see item #2)
6. Japanese: An action game isn’t an action game unless it is developed according the the styles and sensibilities of a small cadre of Japanese masters. They like big boobs, small waists, uber-violence, and totally non-sensical plots (see item 3). Amazingly they like these things even more so than their American counterparts. Note that the developer doesn’t actually have to *be* Japanese, although that helps. They just have to have adopted the stylistic cues and preferences of their Masters

The above list describes Bayonetta, but also (from what I can see) describes the God of War series, the Devil May Cry series, and recent/upcoming releases like Dante’s Inferno and Darksiders. The fact that I am frustrated and irritated by Bayonetta means I now have an entire genre and dozens of games I can avoid wasting my money and more importantly my time on. This is a good thing, since I don’t have an excess of either.

Thus far I have primarily described Bayonetta through generalizations and links to similar games. And what I’ve said might seem unremittingly negative.  I’d like to address both concerns by providing my own descriptions, and giving some credit where credit is due.

Bayonetta is the name of the main character in the game, a witch awakened after 500 years locked in a coffin at the bottom of a lake. She has little memory of her past, so she begins following leads on the few things she does remember. One of them is that she is required to kill Angels which pop up with alarming frequency as she tries to put the pieces together.

Bayonetta has four guns: one in each hand and one attached to each excruciatingly high-heeled foot. She gradually builds up magical power as she kills and taunts Angels, until she can do some incredibly strange magic using her hair, which conveniently also forms her clothing. So, depending on the magic, she varies into alternate states of undress. Some of the Angels she has to fight are only effectively damaged via certain combinations of attacks. And when a greater Angel is slain, Bayonetta will often find a collectable item that can be turned in to her demonic friend for different weapons.

If you like action games (see above), I can see how Bayonetta might appeal. The combat is amazing, and crazy, and nearly non-stop. If you master the combos, it can be varied and, I suppose, interesting. However, for me at least, the combat rapidly starts to become highly repetitive. I can only effectively master a handful of combos, and use them all the time: each of them ends in the same predictable way, with Bayonetta performing the same move and yelling the same catch-phrase. Pretty rapidly it starts to seem rather… stupid.

Graphically, Bayonetta is amazing. And I don’t just mean Bayonetta’s lovingly crafted buttocks (for which I am duly appreciative, Mr. Yoshimura), but the entire world . It is visually stunning at every turn, both in action and when looked at as a static image. The images kept me playing far after I would have normally given up in frustration.

If I had to pick a single frustrating aspect of the game that probably had the most negative impact (and dropped my score by the largest amount) on my enjoyment of the game, it would be the save system. Throughout the game you reach checkpoints. These are points to which you return if you die, and they are generally conveniently placed to minimize the worst aspects of the “action game” combat system. Unfortunately, for reasons which I utterly fail to comprehend, these checkpoints are *not* where you return when you save and quit the game. Instead, saves place you back at the ultimate beginning of the chapter or “verse”, usually a half dozen or more difficult combat encounters prior to where you were when you quit.

Obviously, this is just fine if you truly want to practice fighting the same monsters repeatedly to increase your skill and chase that perfect score. There is an entire sub-game which involves trying to kill the baddies in the minimum time while taking the absolute minimum of damage, and the only practical way to get good at this is through repetition. But frankly, I hate that style of game play. I want to progress, to see the next monster, to get the next doodad- not play the same section through dozens or hundreds of times in pursuit of the “perfect score”. And the save game system was obviously designed to encourage or, more accurately, force this kind of repetitive game play.

For me, these “punishing save games” totally ruined the game. I would have likely given Bayonetta a 60 or so out of 100 if it possessed a more forgiving save game system. This is despite it being a style of game that I have resolved I don’t like much at all. In the end, it is a game that I would have liked to have finished, as the graphics and “scenes” are often truly amazing. But because of the gameplay itself, and most importantly the fact that I’m forced to repeat the parts of it that are least enjoyable for me, I will likely not be spending any more of my time on it.

The title “Wet” supposedly refers to the term “wetwork”, a word commonly attributed to cold-war era secret agencies and referring to assignments involving killing so intense that the workers hands become literally wet with blood. The game definitely has death and blood galore, with kill counts in the hundreds per chapter as the game’s female protagonist, Rubi Malone, slices, jumps, and shoots her way through room after room of “bad people”.   

I’m all for a bit of mindless violence in my games, particularly when the main character is a sexy but psychopathic woman, but somewhere along the line Wet becomes… boring, and worse: irritating. It is telling that I had to force myself to finish the game- I wanted to call it quits several times after the midway point of the twelve to fourteen hours of playtime I got for my money. This is unfortunate, as there are a number of good ideas in Wet- sadly, it feels a bit like there were one or two hours of good ideas cut and pasted a dozen times to fill out the game.

The story behind Wet can be summarized as follows: a twenty-something woman with super-human acrobatic combat skills named Rubi Malone sells her skills to the highest bidder. She will kill anyone, or any number of anyones, to complete whatever mission she is paid for so long as the price is right. Somebody double-crosses her, so she goes on a rampage to kill everyone involved.

That’s it, really. Nothing is explained about Rubi’s background, how she became what she is, why her guns have monkeys and Chinese characters on them, why she lives in a rusted out plane in a plane graveyard, or what the deal is with her occasional berserk rages. The berserk rages are a game mechanic (more on that later) that is actually kind of comical: after killing seventy or eighty people, she kills one guy whose blood splashes on her face, and now all of sudden she’s *really* mad. Strangely, it is always the same guy (presumably hired from Psychopath Baiters R Us), with the same sword, and the same blood splash. Practice makes perfect, I guess.

This kind of weak story is pretty typical for most action/shooter games. Unfortunate, but typical, and it is here where the first of the missed opportunities in Wet appears. Rubi seems like an interesting character, or one that could be interesting. But nothing is done to develop her: she has weird guns, she wears dog tags, and she kills lots of people for money- no one explains anything during the game to justify her behaviour or to provide even the slightest bit of depth.   

The game does have some unique presentation elements- it pretends that you are watching a grindhouse movie from the 70’s, complete with scratchy/flickering film and between chapter “Let’s all go to the lobby…” intermission advertisements. This also sort of justifies the often cheesy acting, and the regular eye-rollingly bad lines (if Rubi said “here we go” one more time, I think I’d scream). But after a while it no longer seemed neat- just somewhat irritating.

The game mechanics themselves have the scent of uniqueness. Unlike most shooters, Wet allows Rubi to use her guns at almost any time: while running, while sliding, while hanging from a ladder, while jumping from horizontal pole to horizontal pole. It is a non-stop fest of bullet flinging opportunities. In fact, a major requirement of the game is that you shoot and kill your enemies in new and unique ways: the more complicated your method of murder, the more points you get to spend on upgrading Rubi’s skills. I liked that aspect of the game.

Disappointingly, most of the rest of the game mechanics are incredibly irritating. Each time Rubi gets a weapon upgrade, you have to play through an essentially identical target-shooting / acrobatics “test” in order to progress. You can’t skip this tutorial, and it can be about as much fun as having to change the oil and wash the car before you can go for a drive. I suppose I could begrudgingly accept this tedium if the new weapons were a big deal, but they aren’t: other than the exploding crossbow, I almost never found a need to use anything except for the infinite-ammo pistols Rubi starts out with.

Continuing the disappointment is the run and gun gameplay. The jumping and leaping acrobatics are fun, but every few minutes the game locks you in a space with endlessly spawning bad guys and several doors. You have to battle your way through the room to each door, and trigger something to “break” it, thus closing that spawn point. This was fun once or twice, but after a couple of dozen times I was starting to get pretty ticked.

Similarly, Rubi will periodically walk through a door and a cut scene will run where some guy with a sword runs up- Rubi naturally shoots him at point blank range and gets splattered with blood, which makes her go berserk. This *sounds* interesting, until you realize that this is essentially identical to the previous “lock you in a room” feature, except with a red wash obscuring all of the graphics. Yep, a major feature of the game is to downgrade the graphics to an eye-numbing monochrome. Ouch.

I can sort of understand how this all happened. Wet was originally going to be published by Activision Blizzard, but they cancelled it in mid-2008. Bethesda picked it up a few months later, but I imagine the damage was already done. I would expect that the development team was disheartened and then had to rush to put the features together for release.

Regardless of the reasons for failure, Wet is a game that could have done better. With some combination of an improved story and less irritating mechanics, it could have scored in the 70 to 80 range on the Kelly scale. Instead, it barely passed 50 out of 100, and it is definitely not a game that I’d recommend as more than a passing time-waster.

E3 (Electronic Entertainment Expo) has suffered through some setbacks in the last few years. The industry show is basically a venue for the manufacturers of computer games and game related products to communicate with the media. Normal citizens like you and I are not allowed to attend. The big vendors like Microsoft and Nintendo decided a few years ago that the show was costing too much money for not enough return, and they withdrew en masse. E3 went through some gyrations to try to re-invent itself, but has basically come back identical to what it was, just a bit smaller. I’m not sure what has really changed, but the big vendors seem to be back.

This post isn’t about E3, though: instead, it is about a couple of interesting (to me) announcements that Microsoft made at the event. Project Natal, a full-body motion interface with no actual controller, and XBox Live full game downloads.

Your body is the controller…

Project Natal is intriguing: note that this is a code name and will likely change to something bureaucratic and unappealing before Microsoft starts selling it. The basic idea: a small box is attached to the XBox 360 and placed somewhere in your room, probably near the TV you play your games on. The box contains an array of sensors: a normal video camera, an infrared camera, and microphones. The combination of sensors is used to detect humans in the room, identify motion points (joints- over 40 per person), and track movement. The people have no special sensors or controllers.

Once identified, the system allows motion of the people to control interaction with the game: if the game requires a sword fight, moving like you are swinging your sword could trigger the same movement in your in-game character. If you are playing a driving game, simply hold your arms in front of yourself as if you are clutching a steering wheel and the game will track the movement of this pretend “wheel”: move your arms the right way, and you steer your virtual car.

All of this sounds like things that have been tried before, with limited success. But apparently Natal actually *works*: people who tried it at the show say that its fidelity was very high, and the only inhibitors were the mental ones of getting used to imagining a controller or object when it wasn’t really there. Supposedly the system is sufficiently accurate to be able to identify people by face and voice: when Kelly walks into the room, the system can say “Hello, Kelly” and log you into the correct XBox live account (assuming you have multiple accounts on your system).

The technology behind Natal intrigues me, but the applications are the big thing here: absent of the need for a physical controller, what completely new kinds of interactions can be created by developers? The potential here is huge: but until we see a generation or two of software using this interface, I am hesitant to call it a really good thing.

My gut tells me that the Natal control system will be most applicable to the kinds of “party friendly” games the Wii excels at. That is, low fidelity “cartoon” sports and strategy games where four or six people can quickly bash out a few rounds of fun. People who like greater complexity and depth in their games and simulations will likely find the control scheme less appealing: I can’t imagine much precision in a system that lacks physical objects to interact with. But it could open a new market of so-called casual gamers for the XBox 360, which I suspect is a market that Microsoft would like to increase its presence in.

Full downloadable games- instant gratification

The other Microsoft announcement was one I’ve long awaited: the ability to buy and download full commercial games on the XBox 360. XBox Live has long had “classic” and “arcade” games available for purchase and download, but none of these are the new and exciting games of today that appeal to me. Starting this fall, however, at least some major titles will begin to appear for download on XBox Live. They will cost the same as normal retail copies, but you’ll get the benefit of having them immediately while avoiding the “retail experience”.

I am not a big fan of shopping. Once I’ve decided I want a particular game, all going into the store does is waste my time and harm the environment. I have to drive several miles, dodge irritating and largely useless sales associates, push past clueless customers wandering aimlessly, hope that I can snag the game I want and it isn’t already sold out, stand in line, interact with a sales person who will ask me inane questions like “Do you realize this is a mature game?” (Yes, you pimply moron: I’m 45 years old, and I buy games for *me*, not some tax dodge brat sitting in my car), drive home, and finally after opening the game and playing it, find some place to store the useless packaging materials. Skipping all of that waste and simply playing the the game minutes after I decide I want to appeals to me.

There is at least one downside that will limit the usefulness of this feature for me. Only “select” games will be available- select in this context likely means “games that have been out already at retail for a year or more and which you have already likely bought, played, and finished”. Unfortunately, the same gene that makes me dislike the shopping experience causes me to be prone to not want to wait months after retail release for a game to be available for download. I want it the day it ships, not six months or a year later after the publisher has decided they’ve made all the money they can at retail. “Select” also means a limited catalog of games: I could imagine there only being ten or twenty initially, out of hundreds (thousands?) of XBox 360 titles.

That said, I suspect I’ll find one or two games I missed on initial release. I hope Microsoft can leverage some of its clout to get a large and timely catalog established: I don’t really see the downside for the publishers, who would get to cut out the production, shipping, and retailer profit margin costs. But publishers/IP owners are weird creatures.