<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Veep wants you to play with his parts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts</link>
	<description>Technology, computer games, MMOGs,  science...and other nerdy stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts#comment-9801</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts/#comment-9801</guid>
		<description>Ii thiink doubliing the Ii's iis useful for creatiing trademarks. 

Brrr...okay, enough of that.  But I don't think there are many English language words that have two adjacent letter "i"s, so maybe this makes such words easier to trademark.  

Hopefully it isn't a trend that becomes too wide-spread, though.  I actually find the doubled Is to be more irritating than the e-This and i-Thats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ii thiink doubliing the Ii&#8217;s iis useful for creatiing trademarks. </p>
<p>Brrr&#8230;okay, enough of that.  But I don&#8217;t think there are many English language words that have two adjacent letter &#8220;i&#8221;s, so maybe this makes such words easier to trademark.  </p>
<p>Hopefully it isn&#8217;t a trend that becomes too wide-spread, though.  I actually find the doubled Is to be more irritating than the e-This and i-Thats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts#comment-9783</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2007/04/17/intel-veep-wants-you-to-play-with-his-parts/#comment-9783</guid>
		<description>Okay, first we had the "iMac" which led to the "iPod" and now "iEverything"

Now along comes the Nintendo "Wii" and now we see Intel "Viiv" ...

So soon everything will have double lower case i's in it?  Maybe Microsoft should have named it's new operating system "Viista" ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, first we had the &#8220;iMac&#8221; which led to the &#8220;iPod&#8221; and now &#8220;iEverything&#8221;</p>
<p>Now along comes the Nintendo &#8220;Wii&#8221; and now we see Intel &#8220;Viiv&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>So soon everything will have double lower case i&#8217;s in it?  Maybe Microsoft should have named it&#8217;s new operating system &#8220;Viista&#8221; <img src='http://www.kgadams.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
