<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computer upgrade 2006: the Coles Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes</link>
	<description>Technology, computer games, MMOGs,  science...and other nerdy stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly&#8217;s World- A View into the mind of Uber Geek, Kelly Adams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why do I do it?</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-17216</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly&#8217;s World- A View into the mind of Uber Geek, Kelly Adams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why do I do it?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-17216</guid>
		<description>[...] second reason&#8230; my current PC build, which I assembled in October of 2006, has given me difficulty pretty much right from the start. I still can&#8217;t put the system into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] second reason&#8230; my current PC build, which I assembled in October of 2006, has given me difficulty pretty much right from the start. I still can&#8217;t put the system into [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly&#8217;s World- A View into the mind of Uber Geek, Kelly Adams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista cometh&#8230;but no ATI OpenGL yet??!!</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-6174</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly&#8217;s World- A View into the mind of Uber Geek, Kelly Adams &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vista cometh&#8230;but no ATI OpenGL yet??!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-6174</guid>
		<description>[...] Some months ago I decided I wanted Windows Vista.  I was performing my annual computer upgrade, and Vista was Release Candidate 2 at that point.  Unfortunately, it wasn&#8217;t working with my games at the time.  I had picked up an interest in Second Life, and Second Life (along with a number of games by ID and other manufacturers) requires OpenGL drivers.  Early in Vista&#8217;s development, there was some doubt about support for OpenGL, but apparently that was all resolved early in 2006 with Microsoft incorporating full support for native OpenGL drivers through the use of installable client drivers (ICD).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Some months ago I decided I wanted Windows Vista.  I was performing my annual computer upgrade, and Vista was Release Candidate 2 at that point.  Unfortunately, it wasn&#8217;t working with my games at the time.  I had picked up an interest in Second Life, and Second Life (along with a number of games by ID and other manufacturers) requires OpenGL drivers.  Early in Vista&#8217;s development, there was some doubt about support for OpenGL, but apparently that was all resolved early in 2006 with Microsoft incorporating full support for native OpenGL drivers through the use of installable client drivers (ICD).  [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4823</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4823</guid>
		<description>You are very welcome, John: it always makes me feel good when my trials and tribulations help others avoid the same :)  But there are new Catalyst drivers (V6.10) available today, and they *do* include support for the X1950 XTX: I just finished installing them moments ago, and they seem to work fine.

I've updated my post above to reflect this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very welcome, John: it always makes me feel good when my trials and tribulations help others avoid the same <img src='http://www.kgadams.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But there are new Catalyst drivers (V6.10) available today, and they *do* include support for the X1950 XTX: I just finished installing them moments ago, and they seem to work fine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve updated my post above to reflect this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>Thanks! this just saved me a lot of time (installing x64 drivers for my X1950XTX)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! this just saved me a lot of time (installing x64 drivers for my X1950XTX)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>I'm running some kind of custom setting: I went one step above balanced, I believe, then turned down the shadows a bit (left some on because they looked nice).

I haven't really experimented a lot- when we go bashing the first time I'll decide if I like my current settings or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running some kind of custom setting: I went one step above balanced, I believe, then turned down the shadows a bit (left some on because they looked nice).</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really experimented a lot- when we go bashing the first time I&#8217;ll decide if I like my current settings or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>What setting are you on, in eq2? are you on balanced, or the one above that now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What setting are you on, in eq2? are you on balanced, or the one above that now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>Thanks :)  I still haven't run any performance tests...I guess I'll have to do that and see how the new box stacks up to the old.

Of course, it *seems* faster: I turned on a few extra features in EQ2 like the cloth simulation and such, and didn't notice any of the lag I recall from when I tried those features on my previous machine.

Once I have some performance numbers I'll post them on the blog here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks <img src='http://www.kgadams.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I still haven&#8217;t run any performance tests&#8230;I guess I&#8217;ll have to do that and see how the new box stacks up to the old.</p>
<p>Of course, it *seems* faster: I turned on a few extra features in EQ2 like the cloth simulation and such, and didn&#8217;t notice any of the lag I recall from when I tried those features on my previous machine.</p>
<p>Once I have some performance numbers I&#8217;ll post them on the blog here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kgadams.net/2006/10/17/computer-upgrade-2006-the-coles-notes/#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the puter :), shiny, faster, newer, is always good stuff :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the puter :), shiny, faster, newer, is always good stuff <img src='http://www.kgadams.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
